Both Long & Short VXX Positions Close In War

Author:

Leon Gross, Director of Research

March 26, 2026

The Iran conflict pushed the VIX from 15 to 25, hitting a recurring resistance level from the past year but remaining well below the tariff crisis level, showing a moderate crisis.

In contrast to typical strategy of shorting VIX/VXX into strength (reversion), investors covered their short VXX positions as squeeze risk reached maximum levels.

The VXX saw a simultaneous 10% drop in short interest and a decline in outstanding shares. Long investors liquidated long positions to take profits.

The VIX is the benchmark volatility index that measures the expected volatility in the S&P 500 over the next 30 days. While the normal level has historically hovered in the high teens, 25 has emerged as a recent crisis level—though it remains low compared to previous market crises.

The VXX is the ETN related to the VIX, a structure complicated by the fact that it owns VIX futures, which possess their own unique pricing dynamic. The VIX has risen from 15 to 25, driven by geopolitical conflict, reaching this high-water mark repeatedly over the last 10 months. (Previously, it hit 50 in April of last year as a result of trade tariffs).

As the VIX/VXX moved higher, short interest has fallen as investors shorting the VIX covered their positions. The classic position in the market is to short the VXX to capture the "roll yield," as the VIX futures term structure is usually upward sloping (contango). The primary risk in that trade is exactly the current situation with rising VIX.

My image alt text

Historically, short interest rises alongside higher prices, a mean-reversion strategy where investors increase short exposure when the VIX is elevated. In this case, there is a notable decoupling; investors are not shorting into strength but are covering instead. Some investors hedge short VXX positions with short equities or S&P 500 puts.

My image alt text

When the VIX/VXX rose recently, the short squeeze risk went from the 70 range to as high as 100, indicating that in addition to the ETN being highly crowded, shorts were losing money.

Following this, the short interest fell 10% in a mini-squeeze.

At the same time the shares outstanding fell as investors who were long as a hedge took profits.

My image alt text

With the war, both long and short investors are risk averse. Short investors covering, long investors taking profits.


Want to know more? Access this data in real time using S3’s BLACK APP & BLACK MAP


The information herein (some of which has been obtained from third party sources without verification) is believed by S3 Partners, LLC (“S3 Partners”) to be reliable and accurate. Neither S3 Partners nor any of its affiliates makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information herein or accepts liability arising from its use. Prior to making any decisions based on the information herein, you should determine, without reliance upon S3 Partners, the economic risks, and merits, as well as the legal, tax, accounting, and investment consequences, of such decisions.

Related Articles

Campbell’s (CPB): Crowded Shorts, Fading Longs

March 26, 2026

Pop Mart: Earnings Support Bear Thesis

March 25, 2026

All Assets Track War: Treasury and Credit ETFs

March 23, 2026

Maersk: War Paradoxically Causes a Squeeze

March 19, 2026