First glance, MARA looks cheap — $4.5B market cap vs. $4.9B in Bitcoin plus other assets. but this ignores the $3.3B face value of convertibles.

Short interest is ~27% but after adjusting for convertible hedges the outright short position is 15%, making “crowded/squeeze” narratives misleading.

MARA is more volatile than Bitcoin due to debt leverage, so a long/short trade requires more Bitcoin than MARA.

MicroStrategy (MSTR) has a market cap of about $53B and is down roughly 52%, while Marathon Digital (MARA) sits at $4.6B and is down about 55%, and Riot Platforms (RIOT) at $5.8B is down around 45%. Bitcoin was down 30%.

All three are Bitcoin‑linked businesses, but MSTR is a holder of Bitcoin, MARA is a smaller, more volatile miner, and RIOT mines with vertical integration and renewable energy.

MARA Holdings (MARA), a Bitcoin cryptocurrency company, the valuation appears paradoxical at first glance — but the puzzle is resolved once convertible debt is factored in.

With a $4.5B market cap against $4.9B in Bitcoin holdings plus other assets in NAV, MARA initially looks cheap relative to NAV. Meanwhile, reported short interest is 27% of float, suggesting investors are shorting the stock below NAV.

However, the convertible debt situation explains both the valuation paradox and the elevated short interest. MARA carries $3.3B in face-value convertibles, currently worth $2.8B, with an expected option-theory payout of $3.05B.

Subtracting this liability reduces NAV to ~$1.85B from Bitcoin alone, and higher when including other assets. This adjustment flips the narrative — MARA looks overvalued, not undervalued

Of the 104M shares short, convertible hedging could account for ~97M shares. Assuming half are hedged, that reduces effective short interest to ~56M shares, or ~15%. Since the converts are currently out-of-the-money, actual hedge levels may be lower.

Crowded shorts and squeeze scores are misleading here, so we exclude them.

Thus, the more rational short position is ~15%, reflecting that most NAV calculations include Bitcoin but ignore bonds. Once liabilities are included, the stock looks rich. MARA is more volatile than Bitcoin due to debt leverage (~2–2.5x).

A hedged long/short trade requires more Bitcoin exposure than MARA to balance risk. This leverage implies MARA could face insolvency well before Bitcoin approaches zero.

MARA’s correlation to Bitcoin is ~0.6, explaining only 40% of variation — meaning it is less correlated than many assume. As a result, MARA vs. Bitcoin hedges carry significant unhedged risk that cannot be eliminated by ratio adjustments.

By comparison, MicroStrategy (MSTR) has $8B in bonds against a $53B market cap. Its short interest from converts is ~9M shares out of 29M total — only one-third, far less extreme than MARA.

Want to know more? Access this data in real time using S3’s BLACK APP & BLACK MAP

The information herein (some of which has been obtained from third party sources without verification) is believed by S3 Partners, LLC (“S3 Partners”) to be reliable and accurate. Neither S3 Partners nor any of its affiliates makes any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information herein or accepts liability arising from its use. Prior to making any decisions based on the information herein, you should determine, without reliance upon S3 Partners, the economic risks, and merits, as well as the legal, tax, accounting, and investment consequences, of such decisions.